Skip to main content

Reinstatement Value Clause in Fire Policies

  

Large businesses need insurance to cover their buildings, plant and machinery, stocks etc., from unexpected losses or damage. Any loss will hamper their business operations. Also, an insurance cover is mandatory for loans taken for the business process. The standard fire policy covers a list of perils with many additional extensions and is a suitable cover for insuring assets. The standard fire policy covers the following perils:

·       Fire

·       Lightning

·       Explosion/implosion

·       Aircraft damage loss,

·       Riot, strike, malicious damage

·       Storm, cyclone, typhoon, tempest, hurricane, tornado, flood and inundation.

·       Impact damage

·       Subsidence and landslide including rock

·       Bursting and/or overflowing of water tanks, apparatus and pipes x missile testing operations

·       Leakage from automatic sprinkler installations

·       Bush fire

·       Earthquake (which can be covered on payment of additional premium)

Sum insured is chosen by the insured at the inception of the policy, this is the value of assets at current rate. This is called the market value of the asset. Fire policies usually stipulate sum insured on market value basis. However, there is another option for the insured other than the market value, that is the reinstatement value basis of sum insured. Let us examine the reinstatement value clause in detail.

 Reinstatement value clause in fire insurance policy

Reinstatement value clause is a clause attached to the standard fire policy, specifying the basis of sum insured for new buildings, plant & machinery.  Reinstatement value clause cannot be offered to old assets. Also, this clause does not apply to stocks.

Claims under fire policies are usually settled either on market value basis or reinstatement value basis as explained below:

Market value basis: Claims are settled after taking into account the depreciation of the property. Depreciation is the loss of value, of the asset due to usage. The continuous use of a building, plant and machinery and other assets leads to wear and tear of an asset. This results in depreciation in its value. The percentage of depreciation is calculated depending on the number of years of the asset. This percentage is applied on the claim payable amount as recommended by the surveyor.

Reinstatement value basis:  The insurer pays the replacement value of the damaged property or asset, as the claim amount. Policyholder has to replace the damaged property with a new one of the same kind. This clause does not take into account the depreciation of the property. Unless the property is replaced or rebuilt the clause does not come into action.

How does the reinstatement clause in a fire policy work?

The reinstatement clause operates on the indemnity principle, so damaged asset must be replaced with a new one of the same identification and model. Obviously, the building or machinery will be improved and more advanced due to this replacement, the policyholder hence must bear the cost of improvement to comply with the principle of indemnity, as the new and replaced property is superior and does not conform to the old and damaged one.

Insurer will pay only what is required to replace the asset to its pre loss condition. Insured has to bear the cost of improvements in the asset.

 In cases of partial loss too, the insurer will cover repair costs without considering depreciation.

Key features of the reinstatement value clause

With the application of reinstatement value clause, the insured cannot recover amounts more than what is required to restore the property to pre-loss condition. This clause is a modification of the indemnity principle of insurance as depreciation is not taken into account.

Normally claim is settled on market value basis. Insured can use the reinstatement value clause to make a profit as it has nil depreciation, so to address the moral hazard aspect of the insured, the clause is subject to various conditions. Unless the property is replaced the benefit of claim is altered to market value basis.

Conditions of reinstatement value clause in fire insurance

The damaged asset must be replaced within 12 months from the date of damage, it can be extended with a request from the insured and upon the discretion of the insurer.

Intention to reinstate within six months from the date of damage must be informed to insurer or the insurer will settle the claims on market value or indemnity basis.

The reinstatement value clause applies to fixed assets like buildings, plant & machinery, and furniture in new condition, but not to stocks.

Damaged property can be replaced at an alternate location, provided it is within the sum insured of the policy

Reinstatement value claims are only valid if the damaged property has been repaired or replaced.

The sum insured is arrived at the inception of the policy keeping in view the replacement costs in the event of a claim.

If the asset is not replaced and the insured has expressed unwillingness to reinstate, the insurer will pay the claim on indemnity or market value basis, after deducting depreciation of the damaged asset.

Reinstatement value clause is an effective solution where small units of large businesses can be repaired and replaced without hindrance to the regular operations. The insurer also offers thorough protection and cover which helps the business owner in saving time, as the insurer will willingly overview the damaged portion of loss scrupulously, by being in regular coordination with the concerned.

We at Zen Insurance Brokers assist in choosing the right Insurance cover to suit your needs. Please contact us for assistance.

Disclaimer:

Zen Insurance Brokers is an IRDAI registered broker which facilitates quick & accurate insurance broking services. We deal with only regulator approved products of insurers. We do not underwrite the products.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AOG (Act of God) Perils Extension in CGLpolicies

      A OG (Act of God) Perils Extension in Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies refers to the inclusion of natural and unpredictable events under the coverage of the policy. AOG perils are events beyond human control, often caused by natural forces, and their inclusion can significantly broaden the scope of a standard CGL policy. These perils are not covered automatically in a CGL but have to be purchased separately as an add-on. Let us look at this aspect of CGL policies in more detail. Indian firms looking to buy a CGL policy should ideally opt for an AOG perils extension because the country is geographically prone to various natural disasters such as earthquakes, cyclones, and floods. Including AOG perils in a CGL policy will help businesses in disaster -prone areas to protect against liabilities arising from damage or injury caused during such events. AOG Perils covered in a CGL policy Earthquake Floods (including inundation, cloudburst, etc.)...

Prior and Pending Litigation in Professional Indemnity Policy

  The prior and pending litigation exclusion in liability policies is a clause designed to exclude coverage for claims related to legal disputes or circumstances already known, pending, or in progress before the policy's effective date. It’s an important exclusion because it limits the insurer’s liability for events that occurred before the policy began. Here are more details about this exclusion. Purpose of the Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion Insurers include this exclusion to avoid covering claims or disputes that were known or existed before the policy started. It ensures that the underlying policy , Directors & Officers (DnO), Professional Indemnity (PI) policy, etc., only covers new claims that arise from professional errors, omissions, or negligence occurring during the policy period and not pre-existing or ongoing legal matters. What the Exclusion Covers Prior Litigation : Any lawsuit, claim, investigation, or l...

Understanding Duty to Defend and Right to Defend in Liability Insurance in India

  In a liability insurance policy, the insurance company has the duty and also the right to defend the insured. The cost involved in defending the insured does not affect the policy limits provided the policy does not state otherwise. This rule is useful because in many cases the defense costs are high when a judicial trail is involved. In some cases, the defense costs can be higher than the claim amount making the defense part of the policy more valuable. Defense costs can be higher than the claim amount particularly in nuisance cases. These are situations where a case is made against the insured party even though the liability is low. The coverage of a claim under a liability policy can vary based on the duty to defend or right to defend clause. Before buying a liability policy, one should know the difference between duty to defend and right to defend and the obligations of the insurer under each wording. Duty to defend Under the duty to defend provision in a liability in...