Skip to main content

Exclusion of insolvency and bankruptcy in D&O policies



Broadly speaking, a D&O insurance policy offers liability cover to companies' directors and officers for claims made by others resulting from decisions and actions made while undertaking their normal duties under the employment contract. The policy includes different types of exclusions; one of them is insolvency and bankruptcy exclusion.

The insolvency and bankruptcy exclusion is a provision under a D&O policy that excludes coverage directly or indirectly from the insolvency or bankruptcy of the company.

Purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Exclusion

1. Risk Management: The increased risk associated with a situation involving insolvency or bankruptcy is a consideration noticed by insurers while bringing forth this exclusion. In particular, claims tend to increase at times when a company is undergoing financial trouble and stakeholders are trying to recover their losses.

2. Moral Hazard: The exclusion helps cap moral hazard, whereby directors and officers may take more risks, knowing the insurance will respond to their decisions even if the company becomes insolvent.

3. Claims Volume: When the company goes bankrupt, the flow and levels of claims increase, adding to large claims payouts. Insurers reject a big liability to such circumstances that reduce profits as well as increase risk bearers.


Implications to Directors and Officers

1. Personal Liability: In the absence of protection against claims arising from insolvency, these decisions can render the directors and officers personally liable since the decisions are said to contribute to or aggravate the company's solvency.

2. Legal Defense Costs: Directors and officers may need to incur legal defense costs personally if claims are brought during or after insolvency proceedings.

3. Due Diligence: The exclusion puts an added impetus on the requirement for directors and officers to exercise due diligence, and to seek expert advice, more so when the company is in a distressed financial condition.


Mitigating the Risks

 Side A Coverage: Some D&O policies provide for Side A coverage, which covers directors and officers directly when the company is unable to indemnify them, for example, in cases of insolvency.

Run-Off Coverage: This is the coverage most people refer to when they say "tail coverage." A person or organization can be protected by a D&O policy for claims brought beyond the end of the policy term, and even after the subject company has gone into insolvency.

Insurance Policy Terms Negotiation: An organization can discuss with insurers the extent or terms of the insolvency exclusion to be revised or reduced in either case, although this may be at a cost of greater or other premium or terms.

The company's directors and officers have to understand the insolvency and bankruptcy exclusion under the D&O policies. Upon realization, thus, of the limitations of coverage and the taking of proactive risk-mitigation steps, the directors and officers could better find ways to free themselves from the possible serious negative fallout with insolvency or bankruptcy.

If in doubt, it would be prudent to consult an insurance broker  to more clearly understand the meaning of the insolvency and bankruptcy exclusion in the D&O insurance policy.

We at Zen Insurance Brokers assist in choosing an insurance policy with clauses suited to your requirements. Choose your insurance policy wisely. Get in touch with us for any assistance.

 Disclaimer:

Zen Insurance Brokers is an IRDA registered broker which facilitates quick and adequate insurance broking services. We deal with only regulator approved products of insurers. We do not underwrite the products.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AOG (Act of God) Perils Extension in CGLpolicies

      A OG (Act of God) Perils Extension in Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies refers to the inclusion of natural and unpredictable events under the coverage of the policy. AOG perils are events beyond human control, often caused by natural forces, and their inclusion can significantly broaden the scope of a standard CGL policy. These perils are not covered automatically in a CGL but have to be purchased separately as an add-on. Let us look at this aspect of CGL policies in more detail. Indian firms looking to buy a CGL policy should ideally opt for an AOG perils extension because the country is geographically prone to various natural disasters such as earthquakes, cyclones, and floods. Including AOG perils in a CGL policy will help businesses in disaster -prone areas to protect against liabilities arising from damage or injury caused during such events. AOG Perils covered in a CGL policy Earthquake Floods (including inundation, cloudburst, etc.)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Prior and Pending Litigation in Professional Indemnity Policy

  The prior and pending litigation exclusion in liability policies is a clause designed to exclude coverage for claims related to legal disputes or circumstances already known, pending, or in progress before the policy's effective date. It’s an important exclusion because it limits the insurer’s liability for events that occurred before the policy began. Here are more details about this exclusion. Purpose of the Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion Insurers include this exclusion to avoid covering claims or disputes that were known or existed before the policy started. It ensures that the underlying policy , Directors & Officers (DnO), Professional Indemnity (PI) policy, etc., only covers new claims that arise from professional errors, omissions, or negligence occurring during the policy period and not pre-existing or ongoing legal matters. What the Exclusion Covers Prior Litigation : Any lawsuit, claim, investigation, or l...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding Duty to Defend and Right to Defend in Liability Insurance in India

  In a liability insurance policy, the insurance company has the duty and also the right to defend the insured. The cost involved in defending the insured does not affect the policy limits provided the policy does not state otherwise. This rule is useful because in many cases the defense costs are high when a judicial trail is involved. In some cases, the defense costs can be higher than the claim amount making the defense part of the policy more valuable. Defense costs can be higher than the claim amount particularly in nuisance cases. These are situations where a case is made against the insured party even though the liability is low. The coverage of a claim under a liability policy can vary based on the duty to defend or right to defend clause. Before buying a liability policy, one should know the difference between duty to defend and right to defend and the obligations of the insurer under each wording. Duty to defend Under the duty to defend provision in a liability in...
Post a Comment
Read more